Electromagnetic radiation, including
visible light, whether in its behavior as waves or particles, moves in space at
a constant speed of 300,000 km / s.
Such
displacement can be altered according to the physical medium through which it
passes, decreasing its velocity.
Going
back in time to the moment in which the light is created, which is that
infinitely dense and hot point, from which the expansion of the Universe arises
in itself, through the Big Bang, until that moment we could say the
displacement of the Light begins; That the radiation moves; That is traveling.
The
measurements and readings of this movement, result in the light-years that this
radiation have been traveling and determine a "time" from which began that displacement, which would be
the age of the observable Universe.
In
my theoretical model, I propose that electromagnetic radiation (light as
well) has properties related to movement. That is, all the elements of this
observable physical Universe are in motion. Absolutely everything is moving,
traveling, and all those movements can be determined as they are being compared
and being relative to / with other physical elements in turn, whatever they
are. In this way, measures, distances, weights, and more physical
characteristics arise and that can only be
determined when compared with other elements. * See Theory of the Relative (LMB
2016).
Consequently,
the Light keeps physical characteristics of movement and can only be determined
its displacement, when compared and relative to other physical elements. This
means that the Light moves because there are more elements with which its
displacement can be compared. For example, if we removed absolutely all the
physical elements of the Universe, such as stars, comets, clouds and cosmic
dust, quasars, pulsars, galaxies, etc., there would only be what I call Nothing Infinite, Space, and there would
be nothing to be move.
If
only we put a star in all that Infinite Nothing, neither would its radiation
move nor travel, since there is nothing with which it can be compared and
relative the displacement of that radiation.
If
we put two stars, then the movement would arise, and consequently the
displacement of light.
Imagine
we are on the surface of one of those two stars, then we would see only one
more star in all that Infinite Nothing. We would get its radiation and we could
say that is traveling. Otherwise, if
there were one person in the other star, he would be seeing and receiving the
radiation (light) emitted by the star in which we find ourselves. So they both
move and travel their respective radiations.
If
we removed the other star, we will only be left alone in that infinite space,
Nothing infinite, without being able to move, (as there is nothing relative to
anything) and with no radiation emitted by our star, (as there is not another element
with which can be compared or be relative to).
Another
example. Imagine that there is only one star in the Infinite Nothing, (space).
This has its thermonuclear reactions, which incidentally, there would be no
temperature as it can not be compared to anything. If we climbed a photon of
that star's radiation, would we move? Would we travel? The answer is no.
We
would not travel or move, for there would be absolutely nothing to indicate
that we are moving; There would be nothing that would generate the illusion of
the movement; There would be nothing to compare our displacement. So we would
be above a photon, static and motionless.
When
would our journey begin? As soon as another star or physical element appeared
in the Infinite Nothing. Then we would have another object with which to make
physical and movement comparisons. We would see that we are traveling at
300,000 km/s and that we are approaching the other star that is there.
The
movement of the photon stops as soon as it strikes another surface, or as soon
as all the elements with which its journey is compared disappear.
With the Big Bang, has been created an
enormous amount of physical elements that allow comparisons, as well as
properties to be relative to each other, either at the sub-atomic scale, or macrocosmic.
Then the illusions of movement arise, among other physical characteristics that
can only be determined when one physical object is compared with another
If
there were no other point of observation from which to see the different
movements that have the elements of the cosmos, then everything would be
static. To perceive the movement, it is necessary that there are points of
observation.
The
perception of the displacement of light comes from the fact that the observer
is in another place and sees that the radiation moves towards him, or towards
other elements present in the cosmos. If there were no observer, or the other
elements, the light (radiation) would be static.
When
the expansion of the Universe took place, the prior moments to that expansion, of
that tremendously condensed point of energy, being in the Infinite Nothing,
without movement, since there were no points of reference. If it "moved," it would stay in the same
place again. In turn, it was in No-time.
Once
that energy expands (with the Big Bang), at that moment a great number of
points of reference and relativity are generated, tending the potential
possibility of creating time, as well as movement; That time is nothing but the
measure of movement. If there is no movement, there is no time; If there is no measure
of movement, there is no time, there is only movement.
If
there is no movement, there would be only one immensely condensed energy point,
which has always been there, since there was no time.
If
the Big Bang had been only a photon, it would be motionless. In that case, the
only thing that would happen is that the hyperdense energy, reduced its
frequency of vibration and ripple, to form a photon, which does not move. If 2
photons had been generated in the expansion, then the motion-time (potential) would
begin.
In conclusion, the light would move as
long as there were other elements with which it could be relative and compared
its displacement.
